Muhamad Segirinya was the best MP in the last 20 years.

The Curious Case of Modern Leadership: Are Politicians Truly for the People?

In the age of instant communication and social media dominance, leadership is no longer confined to lofty offices and carefully crafted speeches. Politicians around the world are now influencers, activists, and, in some cases, celebrities. But this shift raises an intriguing question: are modern politicians genuinely working for the people, or are they merely building their personal brands?

Take the late Honorable Muhammad Ssegirinya of Uganda, for instance, whose political career epitomized both the potential and pitfalls of this modern leadership style. Nicknamed “Mr. Updates” for his constant social media activity, Ssegirinya was known for engaging directly with his constituents through platforms like Facebook and Twitter. His posts often showcased acts of charity—paying hospital bills, distributing food, or attending to local community issues. These actions earned him widespread admiration as a “man of the people.”

However, his methods also sparked significant controversy. Critics accused him of using his platform for self-promotion rather than systemic change. Instead of addressing the root causes of poverty or poor healthcare, they argued that he was more interested in quick, visible solutions that boosted his popularity. Was Ssegirinya a genuine reformer, or was he a master of optics?

This debate isn’t limited to Uganda. Globally, politicians have adopted similar approaches, blending grassroots activism with performative politics. Figures like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in the United States or Nayib Bukele in El Salvador represent a new wave of leadership. They connect with their followers in ways that traditional politicians never could, breaking down barriers between leaders and the public. But critics argue that this accessibility comes at a cost.

For instance, Bukele, known for his social media-savvy governance, has been accused of authoritarian tendencies. His controversial policies, such as declaring a state of emergency to combat gang violence, are polarizing. Supporters hail him as a visionary who is finally bringing peace to a troubled nation, while detractors argue that his methods erode democratic institutions.

The controversy lies in the duality of these figures. On one hand, their visibility and relatability make them seem more accountable. When a politician like Ssegirinya is seen handing out food to struggling families, it feels personal and impactful. On the other hand, these acts often overshadow the critical work of policymaking—drafting legislation, strengthening institutions, and fostering sustainable change.

Social media further complicates this dynamic. Platforms like Twitter and TikTok reward engagement and virality, not nuance. A flashy initiative or dramatic declaration is more likely to go viral than a detailed policy plan. As a result, some leaders prioritize spectacle over substance. The line between genuine public service and performance becomes increasingly blurred.

This shift raises important questions about the future of leadership. Are we, as citizens, complicit in encouraging performative politics? Do we value visible gestures over long-term solutions? And most importantly, what happens to societies where leaders prioritize popularity over principled governance?

The legacy of leaders like Muhammad Ssegirinya forces us to confront these questions. While their approaches may inspire, they also challenge us to rethink what true leadership looks like in an age of constant visibility. Are we being led, or are we simply entertained?

Muhammad Ssegirinya, often referred to as “Mr. Update,” was a prominent Ugandan politician known for his dynamic presence both online and offline. Here are five frequently asked questions about him:

1. Who was Muhammad Ssegirinya?

Born in 1988 in Butale, Kadugala, Masaka District, Uganda, Ssegirinya was originally named Richard Ssegirinya. He was the firstborn in a Catholic family of five children. Later in life, he converted to Islam and adopted the name Muhammad. Before entering national politics, he served as a city councillor for Kawempe in the Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA). 

2. Why was he nicknamed “Mr. Update”?

Ssegirinya earned the moniker “Mr. Update” due to his prolific use of social media platforms, particularly Facebook and Twitter. He frequently posted updates about his activities, community engagements, and political views, keeping his constituents and followers informed in real-time. 

3. What legal challenges did he face during his political career?

In September 2021, Ssegirinya was summoned by the Uganda Police Force’s Criminal Investigation Department over alleged involvement in rebel activities in the Greater Masaka region. Subsequently, he was charged with multiple counts, including murder and attempted murder, and was remanded to Kitalya Maximum Security Prison. Many believed these charges were politically motivated due to his opposition stance. He was released on bail in February 2023. 

4. What health issues did he encounter?

Following his release from prison, Ssegirinya faced significant health challenges, reportedly stemming from alleged torture during his detention. He sought medical treatment in Nairobi and Kampala and later received specialized care at the Amsterdam Medical Center in the Netherlands for his injuries. 

5. What were the circumstances surrounding his death?

Muhammad Ssegirinya passed away on January 9, 2025, at the age of 37. His death led to a series of controversies, particularly regarding his burial arrangements. The government’s attempt to take over the funeral proceedings was met with resistance from his family and political affiliates, leading to tensions and public outcry. 

Ssegirinya’s life and career were marked by his dedication to his constituents, his embrace of digital platforms for political engagement, and the challenges he faced as an opposition figure in Uganda’s political landscape.